Hardware and software setup

External hard drives with sata. Hard drive interfaces - IDE, SATA and others

eSATA interface and high-speed external case for desktop drives of any capacity

Capacious external drives and containers for 3.5-inch hard drives, as a rule, focused on the use of serial USB (1.1 and 2.0) and FireWire (IEEE 1394a, 1394b) serial interfaces, which are traditionally convenient for these purposes, and for some time network interfaces (Fast and Gigabit Ethernet, Wi-Fi, Wireless USB). Despite the attractiveness of such solutions, their main drawback is a very mediocre interface speed, which is significantly lower than the capabilities of modern hard drives used in such devices (the exception, perhaps, is the still rare and expensive IEEE 1394b and Gigabit Ethernet - and then with a number of reservations). Another important drawback here is the need to use special interface converters - controllers that translate the signals and protocols of one of the above external interfaces into the "native" signals of the IDE or Serial ATA disk interfaces. Not only do such controllers contribute significantly to the cost of external drives and containers themselves, but they are also an inevitable link in the delays in the operation of these devices, an additional point of failure and equipment failures.

eSATA interface (external Serial ATA)

At the same time, for some time now, the problem of choosing an interface for an external drive or a hard drive container has found a very nice and optimal solution: the introduction of a serial Serial ATA disk interface, which was originally oriented to hot-plugging drives and an increased (compared to IDE) signal cable length, made it possible to create external drives and containers almost for nothing, simply by bringing the (internal) Serial ATA port outside the computer. This is exactly what some manufacturers did at first, until, finally, the eSATA standard (External Serial ATA, later issued as part of the Serial ATA 2.5 specifications and design guides) was adopted, which regulates the details external use Serial ATA interface.

eSATA was standardized in mid-2004 by defining the design of cables, connectors, and signal requirements for the external use of SATA drives. eSATA is characterized by:

  • full speed SATA interface for external drive use;
  • the absence of protocol conversion from IDE / SATA to USB / FireWire, that is, the availability of all disk functions, including S.M.A.R.T. for the host controller (and this is important!);
  • signal cable length up to 2 meters (unfortunately, cables for USB/FW/Ethernet can be longer);
  • low-voltage signal transmission over the cable (400-500 mV for transmission and 240-500 mV for reception), which reduces power requirements, reduces interference, and also satisfies the cable length increased to 2 m;
  • better than SATA protection against static electricity (ESD) when connecting cables, reduced electromagnetic interference (EMI) of cable signals that meet FCC and CE standards;
  • better reliability and durability of the cable connection in the connector than SATA, designed for multiple switching.

It can be noted that the higher speed and lower latency of external drives with eSATA makes them more the right choice when working with digital video and HD content. Of course, eSATA takes full advantage of all the useful features of the Serial ATA interface, such as Native Command Queuing (NCQ), Port Multiplier, Hot Plug and more. eSATA opens up new horizons for using high-speed RAID arrays in consumer external drives, since previous interfaces significantly limited their speed, so that the original meaning of their creation was lost. eSATA is suitable for easy expansion of disk capacity and server systems, because it can be easily connected to SATA II and SAS controllers.

Brief comparison The main features of eSATA with other external disk interfaces are listed in the following table 1:

Table 1. Brief comparison of external and internal disk interfaces.

InterfaceeSATAIEEE 1394aIEEE 1394bUSB 2.0Ultra320SCSIUltraATA
/133
Serial ATA 1.5Gb/sSerial ATA 3.0Gb/s
Data transfer rate, Mbpsup to 2400400 786 480 2560 1064 1200 2400
Real useful data transfer rate*, MB/sup to ~260up to ~40up to ~65up to ~33up to ~230up to ~115up to ~135up to ~260
Max. number of disks on one bus1 (up to 5 with multiplier port)63 63 127 16 2 1 1
Max. signal cable length, m2 4.5 (extension up to 16 cables - 72 m)5 16 0,46 1 1
The need for a separate power cableYesNotNotNotYesYesYesYes
Number of lines in the cable7 6 8 4 68 80 7 7

*- according to the website

The shape and design of the eSATA cable and connectors have been specified as a shielded version of the SATA 1.0a connectors and a modified connector shape and a circular metal ferrule of the plug and socket:


eSATA connectors.

There is no L-shaped connector key here, there is no vertical option for installing the connector.

For ESD protection, the stroke depth of the connector is increased from 5 to 6.6 mm, the contacts are additionally recessed inside. For better EMI protection, additional shielding of the cable (it is thicker than simple SATA) and connectors has been introduced. Mechanically, the connector is made more reliable, has a reinforced latch compared to SATA. It is designed for at least 5,000 "pokes" (100 times more than for a SATA connector).

Signal requirements have also undergone minor changes: if for a meter internal SATA cable, the signal level tolerances ranged from 400 to 600 mV during transmission and from 325 to 600 mV during reception, then for a two-meter eSATA cable they were weakened to 400-500 mV at transmission and 240-500 mV when receiving. The requirements for the design of eSATA controller boards have also been added.

In particular, this may cause some early SATA chipsets and boards to not fully meet the requirements of eSATA signaling, and may even require an eSATA buffer chip. And to connect eSATA ports to old motherboards, it is better to use an additional PCI host controller on a newer chipset.

Examples of using eSATA in laptops.

Note also that early products (motherboards and PCI controllers) with conventional (internal) SATA ports brought out to the outside are not eSATA-compatible and cannot now be used in conjunction with eSATA solutions (without appropriate improvement / modification). eSATA-compatible devices are marked with a special logo (pictured above). The disadvantage of eSATA, which is quite significant for external storage applications, is the lack of power lines from the host to the drive, as is the case with USB and FireWire. That is, eSATA drives will have to be powered by a separate cable from external units, or from additional USB / FireWire ports of the computer.

Strictly speaking, support for hotplugging SATA drives assumes (by standard) that a full-featured Serial ATA power connector (15-pin) is used to power the drive, and not a regular Molex with +5, +12 lines and ground (or an adapter from Molex to SATA power). The fact is that specifically for hot plugging, the Serial ATA power connector provides not only an additional power line with a voltage of +3.3 V, but also contacts of a different length on the +5 and +12 V lines, which are responsible for the correct sequence of power supply to disk when hot plugged. However, at the moment, manufacturers of the vast majority of consumer (personal) equipment ignore this requirement and supply power to the switched disk (including inside eSATA devices) the old fashioned way.

eSATA can be used for more than just external hard drives and RAID controllers. For example, optical drives can also be connected to eSATA, eSATA ports themselves can be installed in set-top boxes, PVR tape recorders and game consoles, and the appearance of such devices is a matter of the future.

So, having found support for eSATA in the form of specifications, equipment manufacturers (controllers, motherboards, containers and external drives) hastened to develop and offer such devices to the market, and the most expensive motherboards began to be equipped with eSATA ports. As a result, in 2006, devices with eSATA support appeared on store shelves in large numbers, which invariably arouse interest among buyers due to a number of attractive features. And we will get acquainted with one of these devices in this article.

The device and characteristics of the container Thermaltake Muse eSATA 3.5

Thermaltake Muse eSATA 3.5 (model A2319) is a stylish all-metal outer case for a 3.5-inch Serial ATA hard drive.

It is part of the company's Muse line of metal outer cases for hard drives, one of which we have already met earlier.

Unlike the cases of most other external drives and containers, which use predominantly plastic or combined components, the TT Muse eSATA 3.5 case immediately inspires respect, since it is made entirely of aluminum, and all 4 parts of the case itself are made by casting + milling (rather than profiling thin sheets) , and the minimum thickness of the hull walls is 2 mm (plus stiffeners and sidewalls up to 5 mm thick). The case outside and inside is processed to obtain a beautiful fine-grained surface (the paint will not peel off over time, because it simply does not exist) and in place contains stylish designer stripes-inserts (like body casting elements) with longitudinal texturing. The weight of the housing with filling (without disk) is almost 750 grams, which additionally makes the structure heavier, partially reducing the self-vibration of the rotating drive. Product dimensions - 220 x 125 x 40 mm, which is relatively small for containers of 3.5-inch drives, although sometimes there are slightly more compact ones.

Complementing the good visual impression is an attractive round dial indicator with blue illumination, giving the product a characteristics accessories for the products of this company (remember, for example, Thermaltake display panels with similar measuring instruments).

The case can be installed both vertically on the supplied metal stand (moreover, carefully thought-out pads made of light-colored rubber plastic prevent slipping and scratching of the case), and horizontally (there are inconspicuous rubber “legs” on the bottom).

The case does not have special ventilation holes, however, since it is completely metal, heat dissipation from the disk should not cause noticeable difficulties, which, nevertheless, we will examine in detail below.

The design of the case is such that the installation and removal of the drive is extremely simple - for this not a single screw connection is used, - but at the same time, the fixation of the disk in the case is rigid and reliable. The fact is that the case consists of a massive base with longitudinal stiffening ribs, to which the sidewalls are screwed from the ends, and a hinged top cover is attached to the hinge (metal spoke) from one side.

The hard drive is simply placed on the base of the case, securely fixed at the bottom on four guides

through cushion pads.

And when the case cover is closed (on a massive side latch), it securely presses (through thick microporous rubber) the drive to the base, not giving it the slightest opportunity for play and at the same time creating additional protection(cushioning) in case of impacts/shocks of the body.

I remember that the Thermaltake Muse USB container for 2.5-inch drives uses approximately the same mounting principle.

However, in that case there was a real danger of deforming the disk by pressing on the top cover of the case, while in the case of 3.5-inch hard drives such a danger is actually excluded.

As a result, the mechanical part of the body and the appearance of the container A2319 can be assessed as solid excellent. Which, unfortunately, cannot be said about the design and functional thoughtfulness of the electronic part of this product.

According to the specifications, the Muse eSATA 3.5 container has an external eSATA interface (for an external communication cable) and an internal SATA interface (for a disk), and both SATA 1.0 and SATA 2.5 are supported with data transfer rates up to 3 Gb / s. Guaranteed compatibility with PC and MAC with the appropriate hardware.

On the "rear" end of the case (although it can just as well serve as the front end, since there are no controls / indications on the front) there is a power switch, an eSATA connector and a multi-pin power connector.

An integral functional part of this container is the Thermaltake A2360 proprietary eSATA bracket for the rear panel. system block PC,

on which there are eSATA connectors (with an internal SATA cable on the back side) and proprietary power supply + 12V and + 5V (from an internal 4-pin Molex power connector). The wires from the pin-connector, which is included in the break of the hard drive activity indicator on the system board (or a separate expansion board of the SATA host controller), are connected to the same connector, which, in principle, allows you to send a disk activity signal from the computer to the container. The kit is complemented by meter-long eSATA cables (standard, available from TT under the A2361 brand) and power (special, although it will probably not be difficult to find a similar one).

Recall that the eSATA cable connector is not compatible with the internal SATA connector, so replacing one cable with another (and vice versa) will not work.

The process of connecting a TT Muse eSATA 3.5 container to a computer using this bracket and two cables is straightforward and is illustrated in the following figure.

The only point worth paying attention to is the connection of the disk activity indicator wire inside the computer: if you include it in the gap of the disk activity indicator intended for the front panel of the PC system unit case (as recommended by the user manual), then you risk getting a situation where the external the container will indicate the activity not only of its own drive, but also of all hard drives and optical drives in the system unit. :) Apparently, the optimal case from this point of view is the case of connecting an external container and its indicator to separate to the SATA controller board (in the PCI and PCI Express x1 slot), and internal drives to the controllers on the motherboard. For example, a cheap PCI controller based on the SiI3112A chip will come in handy here, at the same time protecting the motherboard from force majeure failure and guaranteed hot-plug support (see below).

The printed circuit board of the TT Muse eSATA 3.5 container is extremely simple, although it takes up a lot of space.

So the question even arises, why not solder, for example, a simple SATA-USB translator and a USB connector in an empty place, thus giving the product more versatility (however, TT already has a new Muse A2357 model in the same case where USB port added to eSATA). Or, say, do not equip the board with its own voltage converters (at least from +12 to +5V) and a universal power connector so that the container can be powered not only from the computer on the rear panel of which the Thermaltake A2360 proprietary bracket is installed, but also from an external unit power supply - to work with different computers equipped with an eSATA port (by the way, this drawback has been corrected in newest model TT Max 4 where an external power supply is provided). In general, the developers here are clearly stingy at first.

Another bewilderment is the stylish arrow indicator Thermaltake. Yes, it is beautiful, but what's the use of it if, when turned on, its arrow is actually fixed in one single position and only trembles slightly (and the backlight is unchanged)? The position of the arrow conditionally reflects the magnitude of the supply voltage (which is approximately constant). And although the Datatransfar Meter function is declared for this device, that is, supposedly "measuring the speed" of data transfer over the interface, in fact, this device simply reflects the activity of the disk access indicator signal (see above), and its circuit implementation on the A2319 board is as follows that the arrow twitches when accessing disks very weakly, almost imperceptibly (apparently, they messed up with the resistor values). Without giving real information about whether accesses are made to the container disk, and not to any of the internal drives system block. It is clear that the Serial ATA interface does not have additional signal lines to get this information in a simple way, but such an almost complete uselessness of the indicator is somehow depressing. Let's hope that the situation has been corrected in the new models of TT eSATA containers, where the use of a separate interface chip can help with this.

Separately, it is worth mentioning that it is optimal to use a container with SATA controllers that fully support the function of hot plugging/disconnecting drives. Unfortunately, not all SATA controllers (especially early ones) are capable of supporting hot-plug and hot-swap, so in order to avoid misunderstandings, you should limit yourself to Intel chipsets with southbridges ICH6/7/8, VIA VT8237R, Nvidia nForce, ATI, SiS , Silicon Image, ULi or others with AHCI hot-plug support. When hot disconnecting such a drive from the system, you should not forget to use the Safety Remove option of the operating system in order to avoid data loss and even system freezes.

Packaging and equipment

The massive and colorful TT Muse eSATA 3.5″ box is more of an image load,

although everything is neatly laid out inside, and the container is fixed between polyurethane foam shock absorbers, so that it can be transported even with a disc inside.

Completeness is also worthy-sufficient, including a detailed user manual with illustrations:

And since our hero does not have any other frills, we can only evaluate his functional characteristics in work.

Tests

The tests were carried out using a system based on:

  • Processor Intel Pentium 4 3.2 GHz
  • Motherboard based on the i945G chipset
  • Patriot DDR2-533 2×256 MB system memory
  • Basic HDD
  • Case with 350 watt power supply
  • Operating system MS Windows XP Professional SP2

The container with the drive was connected to the ICH7R controller on the motherboard and was recognized in the system as a regular (internal) hard drive.

First of all, let's check if the SATA speed drops. So, for example, with a Hitachi Deskstar 7K400 HDS724040KLSA80 drive with a Serial ATA 1.0 interface with a transfer rate of 1.5 Gb / s, the disk test of the Everest 2.50 utility showed an interface speed of 115.2 Mb / s, which, within the measurement error, coincides with the speed interface of this disk when connected internally (see, for example, ). The average random access time for this drive in a TT Muse eSATA 3.5 container was 12.8 ms,

which also corresponds to the case of an internal connection.

For more recent 500 GB Maxtor DiamondMax 11 6H500F0 and Seagate Barracuda 7200.9 ST3500641AS drives supporting Serial ATA II at 3 Gb/s, the interface speed measured by HD Tach 3.0.1.0 utility was:

and

which is also almost identical to the case of internal connection of these drives. After running a couple more tests and making sure that the performance of modern hard drives does not drop at all when used in an A2319 container, we came to the conclusion that it is better to test the heating of drives inside the A2319 case in more detail during active operation, since this particular aspect may turn out to be the most critical and, in ultimately affect the performance and reliability of hard drives.

To emulate the load by the active operation of the drive inside the container, the Heating pattern was used for the Iometer program with a more or less typical pattern for intensive disk operations:

This load warms up the disk somewhat less than, for example, a continuous test for the average access time when reading (random reading in blocks of 512 bytes), but the latter is actually not found in real work for any length of time, while the Heating pattern reflects the realities and, at the same time, is a rather active “burner”, which is confirmed by the data on disk power consumption at similar loads (see, for example, the last part of our review).

This pattern was run cyclically at a command queue depth of 1, 4, 16, and 64 (15 minutes per queue), and after each hour of measurements, the temperature readings of the drive in the A2319 container, as well as the motherboard and disk in the testing system unit, were taken. The results were recorded based on readings from SpeedFan 4.27 (continuously) and Everest 2.50 (hourly).

2 high-capacity drives were selected as test drives placed in the A2319 container for this test:

  • Hitachi Deskstar 7K400 HDS724040KLSA80 400 GB as the most voracious (and "hot") SATA drive we know from the test results.
  • Seagate Barracuda 7200.9 ST3500641AS 500 GB as the most capacious (at the time of our testing) hard drive supporting SATA 3 Gb/s, while having an average consumption among peers during active work.

Based on the results obtained during the continuous operation of the container with the disk for 4 hours, the following graphs were built.

As you can see, after a couple of hours of active work, the temperature of the hard drive stabilizes. Wherein Seagate drive temperature reached only 46 degrees, which can be considered a very good indicator, and the Hitachi drive heated up to 51 degrees, which also satisfies the specifications for its operating temperature with a margin.

Thus, we can conclude that the Thermaltake Muse eSATA 3.5 container provides enough cooling for the hard drive placed inside even when it is actively working, and the performance of the drive is at the same level as if it were used inside the computer.

Price

In the table below you can see the average Moscow prices for Thermaltake Muse eSATA 3.5″ (A2319) as of the moment you read this article:

Thermaltake Muse eSATA 3.5″ (A2319)
N/A(0)

Unfortunately, at the time of writing this article, there were quite few offers of this product in Moscow, and the price turned out to be very high - about fifty dollars, or even more. A cursory search of American sellers also showed a very modest nature of the proposals and a high price.

Conclusion

So, the Thermaltake Muse eSATA 3.5″ (A2319) container for external connection eSATA hard drives demonstrated decent consumer qualities, among which the excellent mechanical design, excellent appearance, excellent operating speed and quite acceptable cooling and shockproof properties are especially attractive. Some drawback is the ill-conceived electronic part (although it is extremely simple here), the lack of support for the USB interface (as an alternative) and the need to use a special bracket and cable to power the container with the disk from the desktop computer used. That is, the actual impossibility of using this drive with a laptop or mini-PC. In addition, the current price for this product seems to be somewhat overpriced, since even for a lower price you can buy a less famous, but more functional aluminum container for IDE and SATA drives with external interfaces not only SATA, but also USB. But more on that another time. ;)

A hard disk is a simple and small "box" in appearance, storing huge amounts of information in the computer of any modern user.

This is exactly what it seems from the outside: a rather uncomplicated little thing. It is rare that when recording, deleting, copying and other actions with files of various importance, they think about the principle of interaction between a hard drive and a computer. And to be even more precise - directly with the motherboard itself.

How these components are connected into a single uninterrupted operation, how the hard drive itself is arranged, what connection connectors it has and what each of them is intended for - this is the key information about the storage device that is familiar to everyone.

HDD interface

It is this term that can correctly be called the interaction with the motherboard. The word itself has a much broader meaning. For example, the program interface. In this case, the part that provides a way for a person to interact with the software (a convenient "friendly" design) is meant.

However, it's different. In the case of the HDD and the motherboard, it does not represent a pleasant graphic design for the user, but a set of special lines and data transfer protocols. These components are connected to each other using a loop - a cable with inputs at both ends. They are designed to connect to ports on the hard drive and motherboard.

In other words, the entire interface on these devices is two cables. One is connected to the hard drive power connector on one end and to the computer power supply itself on the other. And the second of the cables connects the HDD to the motherboard.

How a hard drive was connected in the old days - an IDE connector and other relics of the past

The very beginning, after which more advanced HDD interfaces appear. Ancient by today's standards appeared on the market around the 80s of the last century. IDE literally means "embedded controller".

Being a parallel data interface, it is also commonly called ATA - However, as soon as the new SATA technology appeared and gained huge popularity in the market, the standard ATA was renamed PATA (Parallel ATA) to avoid confusion.

Extremely slow and very raw in terms of its technical capabilities, this interface in the years of its popularity could pass from 100 to 133 megabytes per second. And then only in theory, because in real practice these figures were even more modest. Of course, newer interfaces and hard drive connectors will show a noticeable gap between IDE and modern developments.

Do you think we should not underestimate the attractive sides? Older generations probably remember that the technical capabilities of PATA made it possible to serve two HDDs at once using only one cable connected to the motherboard. But the capacity of the line in this case was similarly distributed in half. And this is not even mentioning the width of the wire, which in one way or another prevents the flow of fresh air from the fans in the system unit with its dimensions.

By our time, the IDE is already naturally outdated, both physically and morally. And if until recently this connector was found on motherboards of the lower and middle price segments, now the manufacturers themselves do not see any prospects in it.

Everyone's favorite SATA

For a long time, the IDE has become the most popular interface for working with storage media. But the technologies for data transmission and processing did not stagnate for a long time, soon offering a conceptually new solution. Now it can be found in almost any owner of a personal computer. And its name is SATA (Serial ATA).

Distinctive features of this interface are parallel low power consumption (compared to IDE), less heating of components. Throughout the history of its popularity, SATA has gone through three phases of revisions:

  1. SATA I - 150 Mb/s.
  2. SATA II - 300 Mb/s.
  3. SATA III - 600 Mb/s.

A couple of updates were also developed for the third revision:

  • 3.1 - more advanced bandwidth, but still limited by a limit of 600 mb / s.
  • 3.2 with the SATA Express specification - a successfully implemented merger of SATA and PCI-Express devices, which made it possible to increase the read / write speed of the interface up to 1969 MB / s. Roughly speaking, the technology is an "adapter" that transfers the normal SATA mode to a faster one, which the PCI-connector lines have.

The real figures, of course, clearly differed from the officially declared ones. First of all, this is due to the excess bandwidth of the interface - for many modern drives, the same 600 MB / s is unnecessary, because they were not originally designed to work at such a read / write speed. Only over time, when the market will gradually be filled with high-speed drives with incredible performance for today, the technical potential of SATA will be fully utilized.

Finally, many physical aspects have been improved. SATA is designed to use longer cables (1 meter versus 46 centimeters, which connected hard drives with IDE connector) with a much smaller size and nice appearance. Support for "hot-swapping" HDDs is provided - you can connect / disconnect them without turning off the computer's power (however, you must first activate the AHCI mode in the BIOS).

The convenience of connecting the cable to the connectors has also increased. At the same time, all versions of the interface are backward compatible with each other (a SATA III hard drive connects to II on the motherboard without problems, SATA I to SATA II, etc.). The only nuance maximum speed work with data will be limited to the most "old" link.

Owners of old devices will not stand aside either - existing PATA to SATA adapters will save you from the more expensive purchase of a modern HDD or a new motherboard.

External SATA

But not always a standard hard drive is suitable for the user's tasks. There is a need to store large amounts of data that need to be used in different places and, accordingly, transported. For such cases, when you have to work with one drive not only at home, external hard drives have been developed. Due to the specifics of their device, they require a completely different connection interface.

This is another type of SATA, created for external hard drive connectors, with the external prefix. Physically, this interface is not compatible with standard SATA ports, but it has a similar bandwidth.

There is support for "hot-swap" HDD, and the length of the cable itself is increased to two meters.

In the original version, eSATA only allows you to exchange information, without supplying the necessary electricity to the appropriate connector of an external hard drive. This drawback, eliminating the need to use two cables at once for connection, was corrected with the advent of the Power eSATA modification, combining eSATA technologies (responsible for data transfer) with USB (responsible for power).

Universal Serial Bus

In fact, having become the most common standard for a serial interface for connecting digital equipment, the Universal Serial Bus is known to everyone these days.

Having endured a long history of constant major changes, USB is a high-speed data transfer, providing power to an unprecedented array of peripherals as well as simplicity and convenience in everyday use.

Developed by companies such as Intel, Microsoft, Phillips, and US Robotics, the interface is the epitome of several technical aspirations:

  • Expanding the functionality of computers. Before the advent of USB, standard peripherals were rather limited in variety and a separate port was required for each type (PS / 2, a port for connecting a joystick, SCSI, etc.). With the advent of USB, it was thought that it would become a single universal replacement, greatly simplifying the interaction of devices with a computer. Moreover, this new development for its time was also supposed to stimulate the emergence of non-traditional peripheral devices.
  • Ensure connection mobile phones to computers. The widespread trend in those years for the transition of mobile networks to digital voice transmission revealed that none of the interfaces developed at that time could provide data and voice transmission from a telephone.
  • Invention of comfortable "plug and play" principle, suitable for "hot plugging".

As is the case with the vast majority of digital technology, the USB hard drive connector has become a completely familiar phenomenon for us for a long time. However, in different years of its development, this interface has always demonstrated new heights of speed indicators for reading / writing information.

USB version

Description

Bandwidth

The first release version of the interface after several preliminary versions. Released January 15, 1996.

  • Low-Speed ​​Mode: 1.5 Mbps
  • Full-Speed ​​mode: 12 Mbps

Improvement of version 1.0, fixing many of its problems and errors. Released in September 1998, it first gained massive popularity.

Released in April 2000, the second version of the interface features a new, faster High-Speed ​​mode.

  • Low-Speed ​​Mode: 1.5 Mbps
  • Full-Speed ​​mode: 12 Mbps
  • High-Speed ​​Mode: 25-480 Mbps

The latest generation of USB, not only with updated bandwidth figures, but also available in blue/red. Date of appearance - 2008.

Up to 600 MB per second

Further development of the third revision, published on July 31, 2013. It is divided into two modifications that can provide any hard drive with a USB connector with a maximum speed of up to 10 Gbps.

  • USB 3.1 Gen 1 - up to 5 Gbps
  • USB 3.1 Gen 2 - up to 10 Gbps

In addition to this specification, various versions USB implemented and under different types devices. Among the varieties of cables and connectors of this interface, there are:

USB 2.0

Standard

USB 3.0 could already offer another new type - C. Cables of this type are symmetrical and are inserted into the corresponding device from any side.

On the other hand, the third revision no longer provides for Mini and Micro "subtypes" of cables for type A.

Alternative FireWire

For all their popularity, eSATA and USB are not all options for how to connect an external hard drive connector to a computer.

FireWire is a slightly less well-known high-speed interface among the masses. Provides serial connection of external devices, the supported number of which also includes the HDD.

Its property of isochronous data transmission has mainly found its application in multimedia technology (video cameras, DVD players, digital audio equipment). Hard drives are connected to them much less often, preferring SATA or a more advanced USB interface.

This technology acquired its modern technical indicators gradually. So, the original version of FireWire 400 (1394a) was faster than its then main competitor USB 1.0 - 400 megabits per second versus 12. The maximum allowable cable length is 4.5 meters.

The advent of USB 2.0 left the rival behind, allowing data to be exchanged at a speed of 480 megabits per second. However, with the release of the new FireWire 800 (1394b) standard, which allowed the transfer of 800 megabits per second with a maximum cable length of 100 meters, USB 2.0 was less in demand on the market. This prompted the development of the third version of the serial universal bus, which expanded the data exchange ceiling to 5 Gb / s.

In addition, a distinctive feature of FireWire is its decentralization. The transfer of information via the USB interface necessarily requires a PC. FireWire, on the other hand, allows you to exchange data between devices without necessarily involving a computer in the process.

Thunderbolt

Intel, together with Apple, showed its vision of which hard drive connector should become the unconditional standard in the future by introducing the Thunderbolt interface (or, according to its old code name, Light Peak) to the world.

Built on PCI-E and DisplayPort architectures, this design allows data, video, audio and power to be transferred through a single port at truly impressive speeds of up to 10 Gb/s. In real tests, this figure was a little more modest and reached a maximum of 8 Gb / s. Even so, Thunderbolt outperformed its closest counterparts, FireWire 800 and USB 3.0, not to mention eSATA.

But this promising idea of ​​a single port and connector has not yet received such mass distribution. Although some manufacturers today successfully integrate external hard drive connectors, the Thunderbolt. On the other hand, the price for the technical capabilities of the technology is also relatively high, which is why this development is found mainly among expensive devices.

USB and FireWire compatibility can be achieved with appropriate adapters. This approach will not make them faster in terms of data transfer, since the throughput of both interfaces will still remain unchanged. There is only one advantage here - Thunderbolt will not be a limiting link with such a connection, allowing you to use all the technical capabilities of USB and FireWire.

SCSI and SAS - something that not everyone has heard of

Another parallel interface for connecting peripherals, which at one point shifted the focus of its development from desktop computers to a wider range of equipment.

The "Small Computer System Interface" was developed a little earlier than SATA II. By the time the latter was released, both interfaces were almost identical in their properties to each other, capable of providing a connector connecting hard drive stable operation from computers. However, SCSI used a common bus in operation, which is why only one of the connected devices could work with the controller.

Further refinement of the technology, which acquired the new name SAS (Serial Attached SCSI), has already been deprived of its former disadvantage. SAS provides connection of devices with a set of managed SCSI commands over a physical interface, which is similar to the same SATA. However, more opportunities allow you to connect not only hard drive connectors, but also many other peripherals (printers, scanners, etc.).

Supports hot-swap devices, bus expanders with the ability to simultaneously connect multiple SAS devices to a single port, and is also backward compatible with SATA.

NAS perspectives

An interesting way to work with large amounts of data, which is rapidly gaining popularity among modern users.

Or, in short, NAS is a separate computer with some disk array that is connected to a network (often a local one) and provides storage and data transfer among other connected computers.

playing a role network storage, this mini-server is connected to other devices via an ordinary Ethernet cable. Further access to its settings is carried out through any browser with a connection to the network address of the NAS. The available data on it can be used both via an Ethernet cable and using Wi-Fi.

This technology allows you to provide a sufficiently reliable level of information storage and provide convenient easy access to it for trusted persons.

Features of connecting hard drives to laptops

The principle of operation of a HDD with a desktop computer is extremely simple and understandable to everyone - in most cases, it is required to connect the power connectors of the hard disk to the power supply with the appropriate cable and connect the device to the motherboard in the same way. When using external drives, you can generally get by with just one cable (Power eSATA, Thunderbolt).

But how to properly use laptop hard drive connectors? After all, a different design obliges to take into account several other nuances.

Firstly, to connect storage media directly “inside” the device itself, it should be borne in mind that the HDD form factor should be designated as 2.5 ”

Secondly, in a laptop, the hard drive is connected directly to the motherboard. Without any additional cables. Simply unscrew the cover for the HDD at the bottom of the previously turned off laptop. It has a rectangular appearance and is usually fastened with a pair of bolts. It is in that capacity that the storage device should be placed.

All laptop hard drive connectors are absolutely identical to their larger "brothers" designed for PCs.

Another connection option is to use an adapter. For example, a SATA III drive can be connected to USB ports installed on a laptop using a SATA-to-USB adapter (there are a huge number of such devices on the market for a variety of interfaces).

You just need to connect the HDD to the adapter. It, in turn, is connected to a 220V outlet for power supply. And already with a USB cable, connect this entire structure to a laptop, after which the hard drive will be displayed during operation as another partition.

Hello! In we examined in detail device hard disk, but I specifically didn’t say anything about interfaces - that is, how the hard drive and other devices of the computer interact, or more specifically, how the hard drive and the computer interact (connect).

Why didn't he say? And because this topic is worthy of a volume no less than an entire article. Therefore, today we will analyze in detail the most popular hard disk interfaces at the moment. I’ll make a reservation right away that the article or post (whichever is more convenient) this time will have an impressive size, but unfortunately there’s no way to go without it, because if you write briefly, it will turn out to be completely incomprehensible.

Computer hard drive interface concept

First, let's define the term "interface". talking plain language(namely, I will express myself as much as possible, because the blog is designed for ordinary people, such as you and me), interface - the way devices interact with each other and not only devices. For example, many of you have probably heard about the so-called "friendly" interface of a program. What does it mean? This means that the interaction between a person and a program is easier, does not require much effort on the part of the user, compared to the "unfriendly" interface. In our case, the interface is just a way of interacting specifically with the hard drive and the computer motherboard. It is a set of special lines and a special protocol (a set of rules for data transmission). That is, purely physically, it is a cable (cable, wire), on both sides of which there are inputs, and on the hard drive and the motherboard there are special ports (places where the cable is connected). Thus, the concept of an interface includes a connecting cable and ports located on the devices connected by it.

Well, now the most "juice" of today's article, let's go!

Types of interaction between hard drives and the computer motherboard (types of interfaces)

So, the first in line we will have the most "ancient" (80s) of all, in modern HDDs it is no longer found, this is the IDE interface (aka ATA, PATA).

IDE- translated from English "Integrated Drive Electronics", which literally means - "built-in controller". It was only later that the IDE was called the interface for data transfer, since the controller (located in the device, usually in hard drives and optical drives) and the motherboard had to be connected with something. It (IDE) is also called ATA (Advanced Technology Attachment), it turns out something like "Advanced Technology Attachment". The fact is that ATA - Parallel Data Transfer Interface, for which soon (literally immediately after the release of SATA, which will be discussed below), it was renamed PATA (Parallel ATA).

What can I say, although the IDE was very slow (the bandwidth of the data transfer channel ranged from 100 to 133 megabytes per second in different versions IDE - and even then purely theoretically, in practice much less), however, it allowed you to connect two devices to the motherboard at the same time using one cable.

Moreover, in the case of connecting two devices at once, the bandwidth of the line was divided in half. However, this is far from the only drawback of the IDE. The wire itself, as can be seen from the figure, is quite wide and, when connected, will take up the lion's share of the free space in the system unit, which will negatively affect the cooling of the entire system as a whole. Generally IDE is outdated morally and physically, for this reason, the IDE connector is no longer found on many modern motherboards, although until recently they were still installed (in the amount of 1 pc.) On budget boards and on some boards in the middle price segment.

The next, no less popular than the IDE at one time, interface is SATA (Serial ATA), a characteristic feature of which is serial data transmission. It is worth noting that at the time of this writing, it is the most massive for use in a PC.

There are 3 main versions (revisions) of SATA, which differ from each other in bandwidth: rev. 1 (SATA I) - 150 Mb/s, rev. 2 (SATA II) - 300 Mb/s, rev. 3 (SATA III) - 600 Mb/s. But this is only in theory. In practice, the write / read speed of hard drives usually does not exceed 100-150 Mb / s, and the remaining speed is not yet in demand and only affects the speed of interaction between the controller and the HDD cache memory (increases the speed of disk access).

Innovations include - backwards compatible all versions of SATA (a drive with a SATA rev. 2 connector can be connected to a motherboard with a SATA rev. 3 connector, etc.), improved appearance and ease of connecting / disconnecting the cable, cable length increased compared to IDE (1 meter maximum, against 46 cm on the IDE interface), support NCQ functions since the first revision. I hasten to please the owners of old devices that do not support SATA - there are adapters from PATA to SATA, this is a real way out of the situation, allowing you to avoid spending money on buying a new motherboard or a new hard drive.

Also, unlike PATA, the SATA interface provides for "hot-swapping" of hard drives, which means that when the computer's system unit is powered on, you can attach / detach hard drives. True, to implement it, you will need to dig a little into the BIOS settings and enable AHCI mode.

Next in line - eSATA (External SATA)- was created in 2004, the word "external" indicates that it is used to connect external hard drives. Supports " hot swap" drives. The length of the interface cable has been increased compared to SATA - the maximum length is now as much as two meters. eSATA is not physically compatible with SATA, but has the same bandwidth.

But eSATA is far from the only way to connect external devices to your computer. for instance firewire- serial high-speed interface for connecting external devices, including HDD.

Supports "hot-swap" hard drives. In terms of throughput, it is comparable to USB 2.0, and with the advent of USB 3.0, it even loses in speed. However, it still has the advantage that FireWire is able to provide isochronous data transfer, which contributes to its use in digital video, as it allows real-time data transfer. Undoubtedly, FireWire is popular, but not as popular as, for example, USB or eSATA. It is rarely used to connect hard drives; in most cases, various multimedia devices are connected using FireWire.

USB (Universal Serial Bus), perhaps the most common interface used to connect external hard drives, flash drives and solid state drives (SSD). As in the previous case, there is support for "hot swapping", a rather large maximum length of the connecting cable - up to 5 meters in case USB usage 2.0, and up to 3 meters if USB 3.0 is used. It is probably possible to make a longer cable length, but in this case, the stable operation of the devices will be in question.

Transmission speed USB data 2.0 is about 40 Mb / s, which is generally low. Yes, of course, for ordinary everyday work with files, a channel bandwidth of 40 Mb / s is enough for the eyes, but as soon as we talk about working with big files, willy-nilly you will begin to look towards something more high-speed. But it turns out there is a way out, and its name is USB 3.0, the bandwidth of which, compared to its predecessor, has increased 10 times and is about 380 Mb / s, that is, almost like SATA II, even a little more.

There are two types of USB cable pins, type "A" and type "B", located at opposite ends of the cable. Type "A" - controller (motherboard), type "B" - connected device.

USB 3.0 (type "A") is compatible with USB 2.0 (type "A"). Types "B" are not compatible with each other, as you can see from the figure.

Thunderbolt(Light Peak). In 2010, Intel demonstrated the first computer with this interface, and a little later, the equally well-known Apple company joined Intel to support Thunderbolt. Thunderbolt is cool enough (well, how else, Apple knows what it's worth investing in), is it worth talking about supporting such features as: the notorious "hot swap", simultaneous connection with several devices at once, really "huge" data transfer speed (20 times faster than USB 2.0).

The maximum cable length is only 3 meters (probably more is not needed). However, in spite of everything benefits listed, Thunderbolt is not yet "mass" and is used mainly in expensive devices.

Go ahead. Next in line we have a couple of interfaces that are very similar to each other - these are SAS and SCSI. Their similarity lies in the fact that they are both used primarily in servers that require high performance and the shortest possible access time to the hard disk. However, there is also back side medals - all the advantages of these interfaces are offset by the price of devices that support them. Hard drives that support SCSI or SAS are much more expensive.

SCSI(Small Computer System Interface) - a parallel interface for connecting various external devices (not just hard drives).

It was developed and standardized even a little earlier than the first version of SATA. The latest version of SCSI has "hot swap" support.

SAS(Serial Attached SCSI), which replaced SCSI, had to solve a number of shortcomings of the latter. And I must say - he succeeded. The fact is that due to its "parallelism" SCSI used a common bus, so only one of the devices could work with the controller at the same time, SAS does not have this drawback.

In addition, it is backwards compatible with SATA, which is undoubtedly a big plus. Unfortunately, the cost of hard drives with SAS interface is close to the cost of SCSI hard drives, but there is no way to get rid of this, you have to pay for the speed.

If you are not tired yet, I propose to consider one more interesting way HDD connections - NAS(Network Attached Storage). Network attached storage systems (NAS) are very popular these days. In fact, this is a separate computer, a kind of mini-server responsible for storing data. It connects to another computer via network cable and is controlled from another computer through a regular browser. All this is necessary in cases where a large disk space is required, which is used by several people at once (in the family, at work). Data from the network storage is transferred to users' computers either via a regular cable (Ethernet) or via Wi-Fi. In my opinion, a very convenient thing.

I think that's all for today. I hope you liked the material, I suggest subscribing to blog updates so as not to miss anything (the form in the upper right corner) and we will meet you in the next blog articles.

Gradual ousting of models of hard drives with PATA-interface from the market leads to a logical consequence: manufacturers of various peripherals around the hard drive are gradually introducing the SATA interface in their products. Of course, external containers were no exception, moreover, SATA came to their camp in two guises at once - as an interface for connecting the hard drive itself and as an interface for connecting a container to a computer (known as "eSATA"). Interestingly, there are also a number of "transitional" models on the market, within which the PATA interface is adjacent to SATA, allowing the user to install one or another drive of their choice.

In the article brought to your attention, we will consider 12 external containers with a variety of combinations of interfaces. Unlike the 2.5" drive cases we considered earlier, today's test participants are not very convenient to carry with them - the reason for this is their considerable weight and size indicators. On the other hand, they allow not only to get a noticeably lower total cost per gigabyte compared to 2.5" counterparts, but also to achieve quite considerable capacities, up to 1 Terabyte. Of the most typical uses for containers for 3.5" drives, perhaps, two can be distinguished. Firstly, the expansion of the disk subsystem of laptops, whose own hard drives are quite modest in size, and the purchase of an external USB container with a capacious disk inside is the most in a simple way solutions to this problem. Secondly, backing up information from a desktop computer: an external drive also allows you to solve this task with minimal cost money, time and effort, while ensuring a very good safety of data. However, of course, this short list of the possibilities of using containers is not exhausted...

AgeStar IUB301


The silver body is made of aluminum. On the back side of the container, designed to work with PATA hard drives, there are: a power connector, a power switch, a USB 2.0 port, and an LED indicator of the operating mode. The device uses the GL811E chip. Overall dimensions are 108 x 31 x 187 mm.


Check availability and price AgeStar IUB301

AgeStar IUB302


The black body is made of aluminium. In my own way appearance this container, designed to work with hard drives with PATA interface, very much resembles some similar products from STLab. On the back of the case are: power connector, power switch, USB 2.0 port, LED indicator of the operating mode. The marking of the controller chip turned out to be neatly erased - one can only guess about the purpose of this act. Overall dimensions are 117 x 36 x 205 mm.

The container package includes: a power adapter with a cable, a USB cable, a screwdriver, a user manual, a set of screws, a miniature CD with drivers.

Check availability and price AgeStar IUB302

AgeStar SUB301


The silver case is made of aluminum and in appearance matches the AgeStar IUB301 model. On the back of the container designed to work with SATA hard drives, there are: a power connector, a power switch, a USB 2.0 port, and an LED indicator of the operating mode. The device uses a SATALink SPIF215A-HF021 chip. Overall dimensions are 108 x 31 x 177 mm.

The container package includes: a power adapter with a cable, a USB cable, a screwdriver, a user manual, a set of screws, a miniature CD with drivers, and a plastic stand.

Check availability and price AgeStar SUB301

AgeStar SUB3A1


The silver body is made of aluminum with black plastic elements. On the back side of the container, designed to work with hard drives with SATA interface, there are: power connector, power switch, USB 2.0 port. On the upper side of the plastic plug there are also two LED indicators of the operating mode. The device uses a JMicron JM20339 chip. Overall dimensions are 118 x 30 x 191 mm.

The container package includes: a power adapter with a cable, a USB cable, a user manual, a set of screws, plastic rails, a miniature CD with drivers, and a plastic stand.

Check availability and price AgeStar SUB3A1

Floston Star Box SE-EUS1


The black body is made of aluminum with silver trim. On the back side of the container, designed to work with SATA and PATA hard drives, there are: power switch, power connector, USB 2.0 port, eSATA port, operation mode switch (eSATA / USB 2.0). The device uses a JMicron JM20337 chip. The overall dimensions of the container are 217 x 124 x 33 mm and the weight is 1.1 kg.

The container package includes: USB cable, user manual, plastic stand, eSATA cable, external power adapter with cable, CD with drivers and an electronic version of the user manual.

Specify the availability and cost of Floston containers

Gembird EE3-SATA-2


The silver body is made of aluminum. On the back side of the container, designed to work with SATA hard drives, there are: a power connector, a power switch, a SATA port, work, and two LED indicators of the operating mode. Overall dimensions are 115 x 30 x 200 mm.

The container package includes: power adapter with cable, SATA cable, user manual, screwdriver, plastic guides, aluminum stand.

Check the availability and cost of Gembird containers

Noname


To our regret, the real manufacturer of the container could not be identified. The device remained unnamed, and will be held in our article under the code name Noname. The cardboard box in which the container is sold can be misleading potential buyer because it says on it that external hard disk. Incorrectly there are also "birds in checkboxes", informing about supported interfaces. One gets the impression that this is a consequence of savings on packaging.

The silver body is made of aluminum. On the front end there is an insert made of blue plastic. On the back of the container designed to work with SATA hard drives, there are: a power switch, a power connector, a USB 2.0 port, and two LED indicators of the operating mode. The device uses a SATALink SPIF21SA-HF021 chip. Overall dimensions are 208 x 120 x 30 mm.

The container package includes: USB cable, user manual, miniature CD with drivers, external power adapter with cable, a set of screws, a screwdriver.

STLab S-151


The black body is made of aluminium. On the front side there is an LED indicator of the operating mode. On the back side of the container, designed to work with hard drives with SATA interface, there are: power connector, USB 2.0 port, power switch. The device uses a JM20339 chip. Overall dimensions are 116 x 39 x 250 mm.

The container package includes: USB cable, user manual (in Russian and English), miniature CD with drivers, external power adapter with cable, set of screws, plastic stand.

STLab S-190


The silver body is made of aluminum, and the ends are made of gray plastic. On the front side there is an LED indicator of the operating mode. On the back side of the container, designed to work with SATA and PATA hard drives, there are: power connector, USB 2.0 port, power switch. The device uses a JM20337 chip. Overall dimensions are 116 x 33.5 x 212 mm.


Check the availability and cost of STLab containers

STLab S-210


The silver body is made of aluminum, and the ends are made of gray plastic. On the front side there is an LED indicator of the operating mode. On the back side of the container, designed to work with SATA hard drives, there are: power connector, USB 2.0 port, eSATA port, power switch. The device uses a JM20339 chip. Overall dimensions are 116 x 33.5 x 212 mm.

The container package includes: USB cable, user manual, external power adapter with cable, set of screws, plastic stand.

Check the availability and cost of STLab containers

STLab S-220


The silver body is made of aluminum, and the ends are made of gray plastic. On the front side there is an LED indicator of the operating mode. On the back side of the container, designed to work with SATA hard drives, there are: power connector, eSATA port, power switch. The device uses the AIC1595 chip - PWM converter. Overall dimensions are 116 x 33.5 x 212 mm.

The container package includes: an eSATA cable, a user manual, a miniature CD with drivers, an external power adapter with a cable, a set of screws, and a plastic stand.

Check the availability and cost of STLab containers

STLab S-230


The silver body is made of aluminum, and the ends are made of gray plastic. On the front side there is an LED indicator of the operating mode. On the back side of the container, designed to work with hard drives with SATA interface, there are: power connector, USB 2.0 port, power switch. The device uses a JM20339 chip. Overall dimensions are 116 x 33.5 x 212 mm.

The container package includes: USB cable, user manual, miniature CD with drivers, external power adapter with cable, set of screws, plastic stand.

Check the availability and cost of STLab containers

TRENDnet TSE-IS401






The purple case is made of plastic. On the back side of the container, designed to work with SATA and PATA hard drives, there are: a power connector, a power switch, a USB 2.0 port, and an LED indicator of the operating mode. The device uses a JM20337 chip. Overall dimensions are 225 x 140 x 37 mm.

The container package includes: power adapter with cable, USB cable, screwdriver, instruction manual quick installation, CD with drivers and user manual, plastic stand.

Check the availability and cost of TRENDnet containers

Test Methodology

To ensure that performance in tests is not limited by the hard drive used, we chose one of the fastest hard drives available: Hitachi HDS722525VLAT80 was used for containers with an internal PATA interface, and Hitachi HDS722525VLSA80 was used in the case of SATA. Unfortunately, during testing, the last hard drive unexpectedly "died", and we were forced to replace it with a Hitachi HDT722525DLA380 (it ended up being installed in the AgeStar SUB3A1 and TRENDnet TSE-IS401 containers). We will draw our conclusions about the performance characteristics of containers based on the results obtained in the process of testing the hard drives installed in them. Naturally, in the case of containers that support two internal or external interfaces, we will conduct several sets of tests, with different connection options.

The following programs were used in the testing process:

WinBench 99 2.0;
FC Test 1.0.

The test system was as follows:

System board - Albatron PX865PE Pro II;
Central processor - Intel Pentium 4 2.4 GHz;
Hard disk - IBM DTLA-307015 15 GB;
Graphics adapter - Radeon 7000 32 MB;
RAM - 256 MB DDR SDRAM;
Operating system - Microsoft Windows XP with Service Pack 2.

WinBench 99

Considering the test results obtained using the WinBench 99 program, we suggest starting with diagrams of the read speed of drives. Here and below, after the names of the containers, for more information, we give the abbreviated names of the hard disk interface and the external interface through a slash. The absence of any results in the tables and diagrams for devices indicates that given test this drive has not been passed.
An analysis of the transfer lines in the diagrams shows that when using an external USB 2.0 interface, they are characterized by long horizontal sections, reflecting the inability to provide data exchange above a certain level, which is clearly insufficient for effective work hard drives. At the same time, when using SATA (eSATA), the transfer lines on the diagrams resemble a "mountain slope", that is, in this situation, the hard drive can most fully realize its high-speed potential.

Now let's move on to the numbers obtained during this test. All of our results are based on 32 GB hard drive partitions. The only exceptions are the read speed values ​​at the beginning and end of the drives, as well as the access time - they are for the full volume. First of all, let's pay attention to the effectiveness of containers in a situation where the FAT32 file system was used.






On the very first diagram, we get another confirmation of the effectiveness of the SATA (eSATA) interface. The quartet of containers connected in this way turned out to be noticeably faster than other devices that worked via USB 2.0. We can single out the absolute leader among the four, it turned out to be the Floston Star Box container - it has the highest Business and High-End Disk Winmark indicators. Among the devices connected via USB 2.0 interface, the unnamed container turned out to have the highest result, although the performance difference between it and the eight identified ones following it is insignificant. Two more containers perform slightly worse: AgeStar IUB302 and STLab S-210. The TRENDnet TSE-IS401 turned out to have very low scores - it is a clear outsider in this test. Due to the fact that it uses the same chip as some other participants in this "competition", the responsibility for unsatisfactory results can be entirely assigned to the manufacturer.






Let's see how the use of the file system affects the operation of containers. NTFS systems. The picture that we see in the diagram indicates a more stubborn struggle. Of course, nothing can shake the leading position of the four devices connected via SATA (eSATA) interface. They once again appear to be clearly superior to their opponents, and the Floston Star Box continues to be the top performer on both benchmarks. Among the devices using USB 2.0, our unidentified and flightless object turned out to be the fastest. The same Floston Star Box lost quite a bit to him. The rest of the containers, although they turned out to be slower, their lag is not fatal. Could not overcome the threshold of 30 MB/s in terms of High-End Disk Winmark only AgeStar IUB302, which closes the "tournament table".


The read speed chart at the beginning and end of the drive gives us the opportunity to get an indirect reflection of the efficiency of containers' external interfaces. Before our eyes, a quite predictable picture of the benefits of using the SATA (eSATA) interface opens up. All devices connected in this way get a tangible head start over containers operating via the USB 2.0 interface. It should be noted that the difference in the results recorded within both conditional groups (by interface type) is very insignificant.


The last section chart reflects the measured access time. This indicator plays a secondary role in the operation of external drives, and this information is provided more as a reference, rather than a guide to action when choosing an external container. It can be seen that although the values ​​of the access time differ, in general the picture is quite even and the difference in the results cannot have any fundamental impact on performance.

FC Test

Next in our testing program is the FileCopy Test. Two 32 GB partitions are created on the hard drive, partitioned in two stages of testing: first in NTFS, and then in FAT32. After that, a certain set of files is created on the disks, read, copied within the partition, and copied from partition to partition. The time of all these operations is fixed. Recall that the "Windows" and "Programs" sets include a large number of small files, while the other three sets ("ISO", "MP3" and "Install") are characterized by a smaller number of larger files.

We will begin to consider the test results from the case when the FAT32 file system was used. Here and below, from the test results, we graphically interpreted only those that belong to two patterns as the most characteristic.







The first diagram shows the speed of creating (writing) files and, as we expected, there are no surprises. Four containers operating via the SATA (eSATA) interface left no chance for their numerous opponents to win, demonstrating approximately the same level of performance. Their advantage is especially clearly visible when working with large files, when hard drives are capable of speeding up. Among containers with a USB interface, we also observe approximate equality in terms of write speed. The exception is TRENDnet TSE-IS40 - it "sags" a lot when working with small files.


When performing a file read operation, the four containers using the SATA (eSATA) interface get an even greater advantage over their opponents. Since in this case hard drives are able to demonstrate the highest speed, the real throughput of the external interface also affects in this case the maximum way. The difference in the results of the leading "quartet" is not very large. Among the containers connected via the USB 2.0 interface, we can single out an unnamed device, as well as Floston Star Box and AgeStar IUB301, which achieved some advantage over the rest of the test participants.


In the case of copying files within the same partition, four containers with an external SATA (eSATA) interface again demonstrate the maximum speed. The difference in their performance is not too great to focus on this. Among containers with USB 2.0 interface, we see a fairly uniform picture in terms of copy speed, with one exception. The TRENDnet TSE-IS40 device can be considered as such, which again "failed" when working with small files.


In appearance, the diagram with the results of measuring the speed of copying files from one partition to another is like two drops of water similar to the previous one, only the numbers are different. Therefore, no separate comments are required here - the alignment of forces has remained the same.

Now let's move on to considering the situation with the performance of containers when the NTFS file system was used.







In the diagram with the speed of creating (writing) files, a familiar picture appears before our eyes. Four containers operating via the SATA (eSATA) interface are noticeably ahead of their competitors. At the same time, there is an approximate parity in performance between them. The devices connected via the USB 2.0 interface turned out to have fairly close results in terms of speed.


The file read operation allows you to fully demonstrate the dignity of the SATA (eSATA) interface. The four containers that possess it achieve a noticeable superiority in speed over their opponents. Devices running over USB 2.0 showed close results in terms of speed, although we can highlight the unnamed device, the Floston Star Box and the AgeStar IUB301, if we wish for the better.


In the case of copying files within the same partition, again we are faced with the undeniable superiority of four containers with a SATA (eSATA) interface - their leading positions are inviolable. Devices with USB 2.0 are noticeably slower. Again, we can state the compactness of the results within each of the two conditional groups, which does not give much reason to single out any particular container.


Compared to the previous situation, we do not see anything fundamentally new in the diagram with the results of measuring the speed of copying files from one partition to another. Quite predictably, four containers with SATA (eSATA) interface "solo" and devices connected via USB 2.0, with all their desire, cannot approach them.

Summarizing

The conducted testing allows us to make an unambiguous conclusion that if you want to get a fast external drive of a large volume, first of all, you need to pay close attention to containers with a SATA (eSATA) interface. Naturally, in this case, you will also need 3.5" hard drives with the same interface: none of the considered devices has PATA-SATA converters, so they can only work with SATA hard drives with an eSATA connection. In all our tests the performance of external drives operating via the SATA (eSATA) interface was noticeably higher than that of devices connected to the computer via USB 2. 0. Of course, one can talk about a slight advantage of one of the four containers when performing a particular operation, but this is not the main thing. It is important that only the use of the SATA interface will allow you to achieve the highest possible speed external drive.Recall that the installation of hard drives with SATA interface and the ability to connect through it to computers allow containers: Floston Star Box, Gembird EE3-SATA-2, STLab S- 210 and STLab S-220. In terms of performance, there are no complaints about them, with the exception of the Floston Star Box, which could not run WinBench 99 test when using file system FAT32 for SATA hard disk and external USB 2.0 interface. However, on the other hand, it also looks like a very interesting option to purchase due to its versatility: when connected via USB, this container can also work with PATA hard drives.

Three of the four devices we mentioned above also support the second interface, USB 2.0 - the only exception is Gembird EE3-SATA-2. When connected through it, they turn out to be no worse than other containers that have only a USB 2.0 interface. Moreover, Floston Star Box is again one of the best in this case in terms of speed. Among devices that only support USB 2.0, the unnamed container looked good, as well as the AgeStar IUB301. True, the differences in the efficiency of this or that device are not of a fundamental nature, so their other parameters come to the fore: such as, for example, design, design, cost, or the ability to work with hard drives of both interfaces.

Alas, not all the drives we tested were able to pass all the tests they proposed in full. Of course, this does not mean at all that in real work they will behave just as strangely, but, however, the possibility of compatibility problems cannot be ruled out. From this point of view, the AgeStar IUB302 container proved to be the worst.

Finally, I would like to note that, apparently, in the near future, the use of the FireWire interface in external containers will completely disappear. If earlier it, losing USB 2.0 in availability (nevertheless, FireWire ports are still not available on every computer), won in speed, now the eSATA interface has confidently taken the leading position in terms of performance, which is gaining more and more support among manufacturers like motherboards and finished computers, and peripherals.

Other materials on this topic


Overview of four external 2.5" hard drive cases
Overview of three Seagate FreeAgent mobile drives
Overview of the universal outer container AgeStar FFB5A

If you are going to purchase accessories for computer repair, then the SATA USB adapter is the first thing you need to pay attention to. Such a device allows communication between the two most common interfaces. The SATA standard is used on almost all internal drives. personal computers and laptops. USB ports are equipped with any modern PC.


What can this adapter be used for? This is exactly the tool you need in case of a hard drive failure. If things go wrong with the HDD, there is a good chance that the computer will stop booting. In this case, you will have to replace the disk, but the information that was stored on the previous drive will be lost.

If the HDD is partially damaged, this does not mean that all files on it are lost forever. Using a USB to SATA adapter, you will most likely be able to recover most of your data. Even if the disk is not initialized, there are many free programs, which will allow you to scan partitions and find any information that can be recovered.

Hardware failure is not the only reason to use an adapter. For example, a user may want to upgrade to a larger and faster SSD drive. Using the adapter, you can transfer all the old data to the new drive yourself, without asking for help from specialists. In addition, HDDs have become incredibly cheap. Any user who regularly updates their computer usually has at least 1 drive with more than 500 GB. With this simple adapter, you can turn your HDD into external drive to access old files.

Anker USB3 to SATA Converter

Not all SATA USB devices are the same. Some use an outdated standard that negatively impacts throughput. Others may not be compatible with new disc types. There are varieties of adapters that compare favorably with the rest. First of all, you should pay attention to the Anker USB 3 to SATA Converter Adapter Cable.

Studying Anker products, one can conclude that the company has no shortage of components and peripherals for computers. Judging by the numerous reviews, everything from chargers to cables or adapters is highly appreciated by users. You may not have seen the products of this company in local retail outlets, but you can easily find them in online stores.

USB adapter to SATA from Anker is a simple device that does the job well. The adapter is equipped with only the most necessary equipment, and there are no unnecessary components in it. The developers have done everything possible to ensure that the device perfectly copes with the task assigned to it. The USB SATA adapter is a black rectangular box. This allows it to be placed on a flat surface, preventing the drive from detaching during use.

2 cables can be connected on the back of the device: USB 3 for data transfer and an optional power cord for use with powerful drives. The cables are strong and durable, making this adapter useful even if the distance between the computer and the SATA 2 device is short (causing the wires to be bent). With its impeccable design, the device will look great in the office or digital equipment repair shop.

Adapter features from Anker

Unlike some other adapters on the market, Anker is equipped with a SATA 3 hardware controller. Relying on software to convert signals may result in performance and compatibility issues. Luckily, the Anker hardware controller used is standard and has been extensively tested with a variety of devices. This means that almost any computer or drive that can be physically connected to this adapter will work. The built-in power adapter supports both 2.5" and 3.5" drives.

The USB 3 port is capable of delivering only a relatively small amount of power. This is enough to power compact 2.5-inch drives and SSD drives. But for 3.5-inch devices, you need a little more power, and a power adapter will help in such a situation. In terms of compatibility, you can use hard drives, SSDs, Blu-ray drives, DVD recorders, and combo drives. The adapter works with almost all operating systems from Microsoft, starting with Windows 98 and ending with Windows 10. Mac OS is also supported. Theoretically, there is no reason to believe that a SATA to USB adapter will refuse to work with Linux, but this system is not officially supported.

Thanks to the USB 3 interface, data transfer is accelerated. The theoretical limit is 5 Gbps, but it is quite difficult to achieve this in practice. Using SSD speed Read speeds are typically around 350 Mbps and write speeds are typically around 250 Mbps. Record data transfer rates can only be achieved if you use the fastest SSDs available on the market. In the case of conventional PC hard drives, the maximum speed is 120 Mbps for reading and 100 Mbps for writing. In this case, the decrease in USB throughput is not due to the adapter, but to outdated HDD technology.

There are not many additional functions on this adapter, because simplicity is its main advantage. The operating system does not recognize it as an adapter, but simply sees a standard external drive via USB. This means that all firmware for Reserve copy will work flawlessly. You can use any data recovery program or create images without any special drivers and settings. Due to the lack of drivers, the SATA USB adapter will work in safe mode and this makes it ideal for diagnosis and repair.

Inateck USB3 to IDE/SATA Converter

The Inateck Universal USB 3 to IDE/SATA Converter was created by a popular peripheral manufacturer that develops not only consumer but also professional devices. Many of Inateck's products offer enhanced functionality while being priced competitively.

Despite the large number of options, the adapter is compatible with all types of operating systems and drives via USB. The only major difference between the adapter and other similar devices is the support for IDE drives. Such drives have long gone out of fashion, but they are still used by some users. This connection standard is used for PCs, laptops, CD and DVD drives, and devices that read floppy disks.

Many adapters are only compatible with small IDE drives because they don't have power. But in this case, thanks to a special power cable, you can easily use not only 3.5-inch, but also 5.25-inch drives. The adapter works with OSX, as well as operating systems from Microsoft, from Windows XP to Windows 10.

Liked the article? Share with friends!
Was this article helpful?
Yes
Not
Thanks for your feedback!
Something went wrong and your vote was not counted.
Thank you. Your message has been sent
Did you find an error in the text?
Select it, click Ctrl+Enter and we'll fix it!