The most cms. What is the best CMS? What then work big projects
When it comes to choosing a content management system for project development, the choice on offer is huge. Depending on how advanced the CMS you need, what its built-in language should be, and who will be using it, choosing the perfect CMS for your project can be a real nightmare.
However, some CMS are slightly superior to all others in terms of ease of use. Some are easier to install, easier to use extensions - thanks to the lead developers for thoughtful planning. Here are 10 of the most popular CMS online that you can use in your next project.
1. WordPress
What can be said about WordPress that hasn't already been said about it? The PHP blogging platform is by far the most popular blogging CMS, and perhaps the most popular CMS in general. Great platform for beginners, well documented and very fast installer. Some five minutes, and the CMS is already working - it's great! Not to mention that latest versions automatically update the core and plugins from within the backend, without the need to download individual files.
For users not familiar with HTML and other markup languages, there is a built-in WYSIWYG editor. The backend of the system is rationalized and managed intuitively. Beginners can easily cope with administration. In addition, WordPress has built-in support for uploading images and multimedia to the site.
JavaScript. Fast start
For developers, a simple and transparent theme language is implemented, as well as an API for developing plugins.
The WordPress community is a dedicated and diligent company. WordPress has perhaps the most extensive database of plugins and themes to choose from. An important feature of the WordPress community is that there are tons of tips and tutorials online for almost every aspect of using WordPress. Everything that you could only dream of is most likely already done for WordPress, and it is written somewhere.
2. Drupal
Drupal is another CMS that has a very large, active user community. Without focusing on a blogging platform, Drupal is exactly what a content management system is. Easy installation comes with a ton of add-on modules with which you can add a lot of interesting features, such as forums, user blogs, OpenID authentication, profiles, and more. Building a website with features social network done with a simple Drupal installation. In fact, with the help of additional third-party modules, you can create some interesting clones of popular sites (such as YouTube or Amazon) with minimal effort.
One of Drupal's most popular features is the taxonomy module, which allows you to organize multiple levels and types of categories for various kinds content.
The Drupal user community provides excellent support for each plugin and any general questions.
3. Joomla!
Joomla! - a very advanced CMS in terms of functionality. Nothing to say, get started with Joomla! very easy thanks to the installer. Joomla! can remotely work with most systems used as web servers, and is quite simple, given the number software which can be configured.
Joomla! has a lot in common with Drupal - it's a complete CMS that can be more than a simple portfolio site. It comes with an attractive admin interface complete with intuitive drop down menus and other features. This CMS perfectly supports such access protocols as LDAP, OpenID and even Gmail.com.
On the Joomla! With over 3,200 extensions hosted for this popular CMS, it's clear that the developer community is alive and kicking. Just like in Wordress, with the help of extensions, you can add almost any desired functions. However, the Joomla! relies on paid themes and plugins, so if you want to redo something, get ready to pay.
4 Expression Engine
ExpressionEngine (EE) is an elegant and flexible CMS solution for any kind of projects. Initially conceived as extensible and easily modified, EE stands apart in terms of quality of development and intuitiveness of the administrative interface. It takes literally seconds to understand the structure of the backend and start filling the system with content or starting to change its appearance. Even less advanced users can fantastically easily start building their website from the back end without being embarrassed.
ExpressionEngine comes with the ability to create multiple sites with a single software installation. For designers, EE offers a powerful templating engine with custom global variables, SQL queries, and built-in version control. The speed of the site is facilitated by the caching of templates, requests and tags.
One of EE's favorite features is the ability to search and replace text in all objects at once. Anyone who has ever made a website or blog knows how convenient it is to change a lot of data without having to go through and open each page in order to change and publish it.
ExpressionEngine differs from the above CMS in that it is paid. The individual license costs $99.95 and the commercial license costs $249.99.
5. TextPattern
TextPattern is popular among designers due to its simplicity and elegance. TextPattern is not one of those CMS that includes every feature you can think of. Its code base is slim and minimal. The main goal of TextPattern is to provide you with a great CMS that creates well-structured, standards-compliant pages.
Instead of a WYSIWYG editor, TextPattern uses Textile markup in text areas to create HTML elements along with the page. The resulting pages are extremely lightweight and load quickly.
JavaScript. Fast start
Learn the basics of JavaScript with a practical example of building a web application
TextPattern is deliberately simple in design, and its backend is surprisingly easy to use and intuitive to use. New users will easily understand the administration area.
While the core of TextPattern is minimalist, third-party extensions, modules, and plugins can increase its functionality. TextPattern has an active developer community providing help and resources on its Textpattern.org website.
6. Radiant CMS
All of the above content management systems belong to PHP programs. PHP is the most popular language for developing web applications, but that doesn't mean you can ignore other popular web languages like Ruby. Radiant CMS is a fast, simple and minimalized CMS comparable to TextPattern. Radiant is built on top of the popular Rails framework, and the Radiant developers have gone to great lengths to make the system as simple and elegant as possible, yet packed with essential functionality. Like TextPattern, Radiant does not use a WYSIWYG editor, but relies on Textile markup to create complex HTML documents. Radiant also has its own templating language Radius, very similar to HTML, which is used for intuitive templating.
7. Cushy CMS
Cushy is a completely different kind of CMS compared to all the others. Of course, it is equipped with all the basic functions of a standard content management system, but it does not depend on a specific language. In fact, this CMS is a web application hosted on the Internet. No need to worry about system boot or future upgrade.
The work in Cushy is as follows: the site of the system uploads content to the selected server via FTP, the markup of which the developer or designer, in turn, can change in the same way as the fields of posts in the backend - simply by changing the types of styles. Everything is very, very simple.
Cushy CMS is free even for professional use. It has a setting that allows you to upgrade to a Pro account and use your own logo and color scheme and other easily customizable features.
8.Silver Stripe
SilverStripe is another PHP-based CMS that behaves a lot like WordPress, except it has a lot more configurable settings and is made for content management rather than blogging. SilverStripe is unique in that it is built on top of its own PHP framework, Saphire. To help designers, it provides its own templating language.
SilverStripe has some interesting features built in, such as version control and built-in SEO support. What's really unique about SilverStripe is that developers and designers can tailor the administration interface to suit their clients as needed. Although the SilverStripe developer community is not as large as other projects, there are some add-ons, themes, and widgets to extend the functionality. In addition, SilverStripe offers very few styles for designers, and you will definitely want to change the theme of the sites.
9. Alfesco
Alfesco is a powerful enterprise content management solution based on JSP and surprisingly easy to install. An incredibly useful feature of Alfesco is the ability to drag and drop files into folders on the server, converting them into web documents. Alfesco needs a little more work on itself than many other CMS's and isn't all that newbie-friendly, but thanks to the sheer power of the system, it's quite useful. The administrative backend is simple and beautiful.
Although Alfesco is not so a good choice for most regular sites, it's great for business needs.
10. TYPO light
TYPOlight seems to have the perfect balance of features in this CMS. In terms of functionality, TYPOlight is comparable to Drupal and ExpressionEngine, and it even offers unique module packages such as mailing lists and calendars. Developers have the opportunity to save time with the built-in CSS generator, and there are many learning resources for this CMS.
reverse side this CMS is stock too a large number capabilities and configurable options.
Even if the backend is already carefully organized, there are still plenty of options to consider. But if you want to create a site with advanced functionality and a little extra programming, TYPOlight is perfect.
So we reviewed the list of the ten most popular CMS (content management systems), I hope you liked it.
The website customer must decide which content management system to choose ( CMS— Content Management System). This is a very important issue, the success of the future site, the cost of its manufacture and subsequent operation significantly depend on its correct solution. The correct functionality of the CMS ensures easy and fast development of the site - convenient build-up and updating of materials, quick change in the structure of the site. Good CMS makes it possible to quickly add functions not previously included in the project (for example, photo galleries, video materials, forums, etc.).
One solution to the problem of choosing a CMS is to choose a common management system. The wide distribution of the control system means that many tasks that you did not even set for yourself have already been solved in this control system, that a large number of users have already identified almost all the mistakes of programmers, and programmers have already corrected them, that there are many specialists in the labor market who program for this system, that there are no problems with the choice of hosting, etc.
In Runet you can find many ratings of content management systems. Most of these rankings are created by polling studios, their clients, or voting. Those. only those who were interested in it participate in them. Therefore, it is no coincidence that these ratings show the predominance of paid CMS over free ones, which has always been doubtful to me. For example, http://ratings.cmsmagazine.ru or www.ratingruneta.ru/cms, according to which boxed paid CMS predominate.
Recently, at RIF 2010, a report was published by the iTrack company, which conducts a total collection of statistics for all domains in the RU zone. The guys wrote their own robot that bypasses all domains and looks for a control system on them. This is an unbiased survey of the sites themselves, so to speak, without subjective commercial distortions. 🙂 Well done, thanks to them for the work done and useful data!
Research methodology
A specially programmed "spider" (robot program) regularly bypasses all sites in the RU zone and collects data for analysis. The study is repeated every few months.
If the site does not immediately respond, then it is checked several times for another twenty days.
Here I will present the results obtained in April 2010.
General results of the study
Total was polled 2,728,307 domains.
The share of responding domains was 66.12%. The rest of the domains are obviously not used.
CMS was found on 15.2% of domains. On the rest, either no CMS is installed at all, or webmasters have taken serious measures to hide it (which happens for security reasons), or a little-spread system is installed on the site, like those that many web studios do, and they use it only on the sites of their clients .
The share of paid circulation CMS is only 13% of the total share of discovered CMS.
The figure shows the distribution of shares between the discovered CMS.
Paid CMS rating
Half of the paid CMS installations are 1C Bitrix. Its share is 49.2% of paid CMS or 6.4% of all installed CMS. Half of the remaining paid CMS pie is NetCat (3.6% of the total CMS). The remaining paid CMS are very poorly distributed.
As a rule, rare paid CMS are used by web studios. To do this, the web studio reworks a free management system or develops its own. This CMS is distributed, usually, only among the clients of the developer's studio. The advantage for web studios is obvious - such a unique CMS binds the client to the studio for the entire life of the created site, because. All improvements and maintenance of the site can only be performed by the authors. It will be very difficult for a third-party programmer to understand such a CMS without documentation and descriptions.
Free CMS rating
The leader among free systems is WordPress - its share is 37.7% or about 33% among all used CMS. This is the absolute leader today.
It is followed by Joomla, which is installed on 28.8% of sites with free engines, which is 25% of the CMS of the Russian Internet.
Good performance for DLE ( Data Life Engine) - 16% from free engines or 14% from Runet.
It is followed by uCoz, which slightly exceeds 1C Bitrix in frequency of use (6.5% of the total number of CMS), and then Drupal, which surpasses the second paid CMS NetCat with an installation frequency of 4.1%.
The functionality of the listed free CMS is in no way inferior to the leaders of the paid market. (Excluding, perhaps, the uCoz engine, on which it hardly makes sense to build serious projects - it is too tied to its hosting).
For a number of functions free systems even significantly outperform paid circulation solutions. So draw your own conclusions!
The speed of various CMS
When choosing a CMS, it is important to take into account its performance, so that later it does not turn out that the site cannot cope even with a small load.
The figure below shows the first page load speed. The graph is given in relative units, the speed of the fastest CMS is taken as 10 points.
In principle, the spread in the performance of different engines is not very large - only four times. Such a small difference can always be compensated by optimizing the site or choosing a faster host.
It turns out that paid CMSs have no advantages here, 1C-Bitrix is one of the slowest management systems.
Separately, it must be said about the performance of the popular system WordPress. The study showed that it lags behind the best examples. This is due to the fact that accelerators are not included in the basic kit, which is on most sites.
Therefore, site owners on this CMS should not forget to include accelerator modules in the package. Conventional accelerators are quite enough, the widespread and not the best WP-Cache module gives several times the speedup, which is enough even for sites with a heavy load. And yet there is also super cache, Hyper Cache, DB Cache and others. In general, accelerator plugins allow you to increase performance by tens and hundreds of times.
Usually, the problem of web server performance is underestimated by customers. Most customers raise this issue with the manufacturer at a time when they have already managed to attract significant traffic to the site. But not every CMS has the ability to quickly improve performance. Therefore, it is better to use CMS that allow you to optimize performance.
CMS is a content management system (Content Management System). In the jargon of specialists - the engine. This is a software shell and a set of tools that allows you to create content and manage it, change the design and functionality of the site, ensure the security of access, and the safety of information.
The functions provided to the user differ in each CMS. Some of them specialize in a specific type of site: online store, corporate website, informational portal, landing. Others are universal. For obvious reasons, we are only interested in modern engines for an online store.
CMS ratings for online stores
The question of popularity and evaluation by users of a particular CMS is not dictated by idle interest. People with no experience in developing online stores during the planning of the project have to trust either expert opinion or the majority. Let's try to figure out how CMS for online stores are distributed by popularity and how close the opinion of the majority is to the opinion of professionals. What for? So that you have something to build on when making such an important decision.
The analytical portal CMS Magazine regularly updates the ratings of engines for the online store. The location of a particular system in the ranking depends on the number of sites created on the engine and their authority from the point of view of search engines - thematic citation index or TIC. The rating also reflects the number of partner companies and developer reviews.
This list includes more than 900 engines for an online store, not all of which deserve mention. Let's study the leaders of this market: here's how paid CMS for online stores were distributed:
2. UMI.CMS
3. NetCat
4. Shop Script
5. CS Cart
6. Diafan.CMS
7. Host CMS
8. AMIRO.CMS
9 Simpla
10.inSales
Most of the titles in the rating are "boxed" CMS, which are purchased and installed on the customer's server. Shop-Script, HostCMS and inSales are tools based on cloud technology(SaaS - Software as a Service), which users use remotely on a rental basis. We will discuss the difference between these solutions a little later.
Free CMS for online store ranked as follows:
- opencart
- Joomla!
- WordPress
- Drupal
- Magento
- PrestaShop
- Moguta.CMS
- django CMS
- osCommerce
This time we will not consider free engines - such solutions are inferior to commercial solutions in terms of security, functionality, integration with internal accounting and payment processing systems. In addition, developing serious projects on free CMS for online stores is often not much cheaper than on commercial products. Due to the lack of sane support from both the manufacturer of free software platform, and on the part of the integrator, the cost and time of programmers working on tasks grows in proportion to the complexity of these tasks. The main advantage of free engines is that they are free. Agree, for development in the field of Internet commerce this is not the most important thing.
Runet Rating is a resource that analyzes a lot of important information in the field of digital technologies. Among other merits, there is an annual efficiency rating of boxed, studio, and open source engines. So, the top paid CMS we are interested in:
1. "1C-Bitrix: Site Management"
2. UMI.CMS
3. NetCat
4.HostCMS
5. CS Cart
6. Shop Script
7. AMIRO.CMS
8.Data Life Engine
9.DIAFAN.CMS
10. CMS S.Builder
The positions in this rating were distributed a little differently - the methodology, in addition to the number of projects and their TIC, provides for the average attendance of each resource. It seems that such an estimation method is more accurate, but this is highly debatable. Attendance of sites made on any engine is evaluated regardless of the specifics of the resource: an online store, a blog or a news site, a landing page. But the attendance of an online store and, for example, an entertainment portal are far from equivalent things. Due to the presence of such a controversial criterion in this evaluation method, we will consider the first rating to be more relevant.
The agony of choice
To choose main instrument to work on a project based only on other people's preferences is a rather risky business. The choice of CMS should be approached seriously, evaluating the goals and capabilities, as well as the features of the systems offered by the market. Remember: there are no outright bad or best engines, only the most successful solutions. Here are the main characteristics by which it is worth evaluating and comparing paid engines:
Engine code openness
It ranges from completely open source code to closed "cloud" CMS. Influences the possibilities of integration with other systems and services, the possibilities fine tuning and expanding the functionality for their own purposes.
Admin Security
The functionality and content of the online store should be protected from intruders as much as possible. It is important that the architecture of the platform guarantees the owner protection from developer errors and makes it as difficult as possible for outside interference in the normal operation of the site.
Ease of use of the engine
Even professional complex tools should leave an opportunity for a novice user to get used to it on their own, and content management should be as fast and convenient as possible.
Flexibility, functionality
The rule "the more - the better" does not work here. It is important to evaluate the prospects and goals of your project and choose a tool that can satisfy them all, taking into account future development. Buying the most sophisticated edition of CMS for online stores in order to develop a small and unpretentious site is rather unreasonable. If you find it difficult to choose - discuss the issue with a consultant or your developer. Here, as in medicine: self-treatment rarely leads to the desired result.
Integration with other products
Opportunities and ease of collaboration with CRM, ERP, IP-telephony services necessary for the operation of an online store. In “two clicks”, such things are almost never done, so the complexity and cost of integration work will depend on the chosen CMS.
Reliability and stability
The store website and data exchange with CRM or accounting system should work without errors and delays, even at maximum load.
SEO optimization
The online store engine should not interfere search engines properly index the content of the site. It should have a logical page structure and a high-quality visual editor, not to produce "garbage code". Unfortunately, even popular CMS out of the box allow users and developers to make serious mistakes in this area.
Solution cost
The price of the license and its renewal, the volume and cost of the work of analysts and designers are taken into account. developers, designers, purchase of additional modules. The cost of an engine license is just the tip of the iceberg, so choosing an inexpensive CMS can lead to much higher costs in the long run.
Popularity of CMS
Work speed
All pages and elements of the site should load as quickly as possible (no longer than 2 seconds), work without freezes and long loads. This parameter is often underestimated and very in vain: low speed site is annoying potential buyers, leads to incomplete purchases and worsens positions in search engines.
Visualization of an unsuccessful choice of CMS
In popular commercial engines, universal or for Internet commerce, almost always provide basic functions for the operation of an online store: a shopping catalog, a shopping cart, integration with delivery services, payment and accounting systems. But functionality is different for functionality and you should clearly know: what your store needs, what you would like to have, and what of this is in the CMS in question. The implementation of the functionality is also very different from one CMS to another. For this reason, it is worth trusting rather specialists with proven implementation experience than the assurances of the CMS manufacturer.
Most paid engines for online stores come in several editions, which differ from each other in the presence of additional functionality. For example, in "1C-Bitrix: Business", for each product, you can keep track of several prices, and in "1C-Bitrix: Small Business" - only one.
In addition to the abundance of engines and their editions, developers sometimes supplement their products with a "marketplace" - a catalog of ready-made solutions and modules that expand the functionality of the engine. Contains both free and paid solutions.
Checklist for choosing a CMS
Let's form a brief algorithm for selecting and evaluating CMS:
Form your expectations from the store website, down to the smallest nuances. Compose technical task in the language of specialists - quite a serious work, so it is better to hire a consultant with proven experience. The terms of reference formed by incompetent people for the creation of the site - if not the premature death of the project, then a very unpleasant experience.
Break down the requirements into major, important, and minor. Write it out as a list or table, in priority order.
Familiarize yourself with the functionality of each CMS: whether all systems are able to fully satisfy the needs. If so, which edition. If not, make an appropriate note to add this revision to the TOR for creating an online store.
Seek advice from trustworthy developers. We recommend choosing those that work on the same system, as each of them has its own characteristics. Do not trust a project to specialists who claim that they work equally well with several platforms - this is a hoax. Describe the requirements for the site, product niche, target audience. Ask for a rough estimate broken down by expense item. Pay special attention to how the contractor evaluates the pre-design work and whether the design stage is included in the estimate. His absence is a wake-up call.
Gather additional information: contact each CMS support directly for clarifications, compare system requirements, see examples of popular sites developed on the selected platform. It would be useful to read discussions of platforms of developers and Internet merchants in their usual habitats.
After comparing all the data, exclude unsuitable CMS from consideration and mark the most relevant ones.
The final decision path looks like this:
What do I want
What CMS is suitable for this
What studio can do
How much will it cost
Overview of popular commercial CMS
When the question of choosing and evaluating a CMS for online stores has been sorted out, it is appropriate to make a small review of the top 5 engines for online stores. Based on the rankings and short description features of each of the systems, choosing a CMS will become much easier.
"1C-Bitrix: Site Management"
"1C-Bitrix" is a universal product for creating websites, on which it is convenient to develop resources of all kinds. A number of advantages brought the system to the first lines of ratings.
"1C-Bitrix" is the most powerful commercial engine for creating any Internet projects. The company has several thousand development partners, and the number of online stores developed on it is in the tens of thousands. As a CMS for online stores, 1C-Bitrix takes first place in all ratings, including international ones. It is much easier to find a specialist or a developer studio for a 1C-Bitrix project than for other products.
This platform has created the most developed project development ecosystem around itself. Thousands of companies of various profiles are able to take on projects of various classes. The customer, however, must have sufficient competencies to analyze the competence of the developer. Another advantage of the engine is safety and reliability. Sites on Bitrix are resistant to attacks, data theft and hacking attempts. Everyone is trying to “hack” the market leader, from hacker gurus to schoolchildren, so vulnerabilities are fixed and eliminated very quickly. In other CMS, they can exist for years.
"1C-Bitrix: Site Management" is much easier than other systems to integrate with products of the "1C: Enterprise" family ("1C: Trade Management" and others). Integration with the accounting system is one of the most important stages in the development of any online store.
Among the shortcomings, as a rule, they note somewhat increased requirements for resources, the complexity of the program code, which, however, is solved by attracting a qualified integrator to the project. The license "1C-Bitrix: Site Management" is slightly more expensive than the average cost of paid CMS, as well as the average price of an hour of development on this engine. The 1C-Bitrix company regularly conducts certification of developer partners. This is a good initial filter in the developer's choice. Partners of the company and their competence can be checked on the official website.
In total, two editions are suitable for working with an online store: "Small Business" - 35,900 thousand rubles and "Business" - 72,900 thousand rubles. Annual renewal of the license costs 60% of its cost or 22% if the renewal is made no later than one month after the expiration of the license. Also, the company offers the product "1C-Bitrix: Enterprise" for especially large projects with a heavy load. License price: from 1.5 million rubles and more, development and licensing - on individual terms. Suitable for large projects with the need to provide distributed computing.
Control panel "1C-Bitrix"
We at Art-Fresh Ecommerce Solutions work exclusively with Bitrix and are its gold certified partner. In particular, the edition of this CMS can also be purchased from us (just below).
UMI.CMS is one of the oldest paid engines system. A fairly simple engine for both creating a site and for work.
UMI.CMS is one of the oldest paid engines system. It features convenient content management, well-developed technical documentation and a fairly low price for a license, but not for development. A fairly simple engine for both creating a site and for work.
Cons: frequent bugs in the work of the admin panel, the difficulty of finding qualified specialists, which can lead to a high cost of improvement and significant risks when changing developers. The system is well-established for solving standard problems, but developing for your unique tasks can be difficult.
For online stores, CMS presents three editions: Shop, Commerce and Ultimate, 22,900, 34,900 and 79,00 thousand, respectively. License renewal - 80% of the cost and 20% subject to advance renewal.
UMI.CMS control panel
Sufficiently functional for its price CMS for online stores. Among the first advantages of the engine is efficiency.
Sufficiently functional for its price CMS for online stores. The company positions the product as a "smart CMS" that allows not only to create projects, but also to increase their efficiency. There is a simple landing page builder and some interesting original modules. Among the first advantages of the engine is efficiency. This applies to both the price of the product and the system's resource requirements.
Among the shortcomings most often noted are errors and illogicalities in program code, complicating the work of specialists, the inconvenience of the interface. The speed of the finished site may leave much to be desired - for highly loaded projects, it is better to prefer another platform.
CMS offers five editions, but only three of them are suitable for Internet commerce: 14,900, 29,900 and 44,900 thousand rubles. Renewal - 40% of the editorial cost.
SaaS cloud based website builder. The service combines CMS, CRM and hosting for a future online store.
SaaS website builder (hosted in the cloud). Project management takes place on a remote company server and does not require software to be installed on your own hosting or server. The service combines CMS, CRM (not on all tariffs) and hosting for a future online store - the user only needs to configure appearance and functionality, download a product catalog, optionally integrate with 1C, select a domain and start trading. Great for a first and small online store.
A developer or studio is not required, creating a store is quite easy on your own. The company also offers paid turnkey online store setup. Thus, all that is required from the user is a technical task, a ready-made catalog of goods, communication with those. support.
A distinctive feature of the engine, in addition to SaaS technology, is the availability of useful analytical tools. Shop-Script better than competitors implements traffic analysis, SEO parameters, behavioral factors, profits from the sale, the "value" of the buyer, etc. The service is equipped with all kinds of metrics, tests and tools for analyzing everything that makes sense to analyze.
Among the disadvantages are the closed code, the complexity of SEO optimization, the inability to fine-tune the functionality and design, the lack of extensibility and security. In particular, Shop-Script was involved in a scandal when the Yandex search engine absolutely freely indexed the personal data of thousands of online store users on this CMS, after which they got into open access. The cost of the Shop Script license is from 250 to 2500 rubles per month. Setting up the site on a turnkey basis - 10,000, is done by the company's employees.
Hello, dear readers of the blog site. Today I want to talk about such a thing as a site engine or, speaking “scientifically”, CMS (content management systems).
In fact, these are programs for a web server that greatly simplify the creation and maintenance of the site. Well, the website itself will allow you (if you create it yourself and will not spend money on its promotion).
If you want to add your resource to this rating, then do not use the corresponding button on the right above the table.
By the way, if you think that it will be difficult for you, you can look at web studio rating located on the same resource. There you can see the projects created by this studio by clicking on the link in the "Works" column.
Something like this looks like statistics on the engines used by Runet users (here not only Joomla, but in general all popular CMS) in the context of which version of the CMS is used - new or outdated:
On Joomla, in addition to ordinary sites, quite a lot is created, thanks to the existing store extension called .
Probably the easiest free engine to learn is WordPress. Of course, it is mainly used for a rather narrow niche (creating and introducing blogs), but if you wish, you can implement websites, forums, and galleries on it. But first of all, WordPress is a very functional blogging CMS.
the site is running exactly under the control of WordPress (but this is a secret, because the engine used and its version must be hidden, judging by the advice of Yandex voiced above). I wrote and continue to write about the subtleties and nuances of working with this engine in the section, and about extensions for it - in the section.
Judging by the CMS speed chart above, WordPress races, but I personally did not feel it. In general, WordPress can be made to run fast and not create an outrageous . True, it will take a little time to do this, but your blog can become very fast and very easy. I wrote about the increase in the heading of the same name.
Now my blog is hosted on and with a load of 20-25 thousand visitors per day, I am still satisfied with the speed of WordPress, especially after finalizing the template and optimizing everything that can be optimized. Although when using a large number of plugins, without and without additional optimization, WordPress becomes quite a heavyweight monster.
It is clear that there are still a lot of free CMS that are used for one purpose or another. This is still the same Drupal or DLE (DataLife Engine), and in many cases their use will be justified, because the ideal CMS does not exist, but WordPress and Joomla mentioned just above are the most popular. The reason may be their rather simple device and clarity for novice users.
Which of the paid engines are the most interesting
As a not very expensive and fast enough paid CMS, one can cite as an example S.Builder. To understand how to create sites on this engine, most likely, it will not take you very much time, because. it has a fairly low entry threshold (as they say, intuitively understandable). This system was written for the end user, who is absolutely unprepared and has no experience in webmastering (it knows how to work in Word, okay).
S.Builder is quite flexible and you can do almost everything with it, but, say, unlike Drupal (on which you can also do almost everything), you can do all this on S.Builder without getting into the code at all (there is a powerful module constructor for your needs).
Well, and as I mentioned, this CMS is one of the fastest engines and holds the load quite well, although it is also written in PHP. This is most likely due to the good cleanliness of the code (it was written from scratch) and the good work of caching.
S.Builder is free to try both online and offline. In the first case, you will need to go to the "Demo version on-line" page and a temporary site will be created for you on this CMS, where all the modules for "testing the pen" will be available. If online testing does not suit you, then you can download from the page " Download CMS"A fully functional and absolutely free offline version of this engine (as if you) -" Trial version CMS for installation on a local computer.
Finally, I want to give you the opinion of a professional optimizer from the very well-known Seo company Ashmanov and Partners, who gave a rather detailed answer to the question - Which CMS is better:
P.S. Sometimes there is a desire to know what kind of engine does this or that site work on. It turns out that this can be done quite simply and elegantly. In the article, I just mentioned such a plugin - Wappalyzer. A very curious thing.
Top 10 online store CMS rating 2016 is a review that many of our readers have been waiting for. We have prepared it especially for those who are interested in the top CMS for an online store and in choosing the best platform.
E-commerce is gaining momentum every year not only around the world, but also in Russia. And although the growth rate of electronic sales in our country is not as frisky as, for example, in the United States, this growth still does not slow down. There is a serious boom in the field of e-commerce, so many serious businessmen are trying to invest in the creation of online trading platforms. In other words, they create online stores.
To create a store, you need an engine, that is, a platform. Choosing the right platform depends on many factors, including individual requirements and needs. To make it easier for you to understand, we decided to prepare a CMS rating of online stores in the US and Russia for comparison, to give you general idea about the popularity of using different solutions. We will also briefly talk about each of these platforms. You will learn what are the advantages and disadvantages of each of them, and you will be able to make the final decision.
Before moving on to a direct comparison of the popularity of CMS platforms, we would like to give some statistics for the e-commerce market in the US and Russia.
The US is the second largest e-commerce market after China. The market size for 2016 here amounted to $349 billion. Russia ranks 9th in this rating with a market size 17 times smaller - $20 billion. At the end of 2015, the share of online sales was Russian market was 3.5%, while in the US this figure was almost three times higher (9%). Despite this, in Russia every year there is an increased interest in Internet products. Thus, in the period from 2008 to 2014, Internet commerce in Russia grew by more than 40% annually, even during the crisis. There are quite serious prospects for further development in the Russian e-commerce market.
US and Russia Online Store CMS Ranking 2016 – Comparative Charts
We specifically decided to compare the popularity of CMS for an online store between Russia and the USA in order to show what solutions are used overseas. Thanks to the analysis resource Builtwith, we can provide you with interesting charts that clearly show the general trend.
As you can see, the ranking of the most popular CMS in the two countries is seriously different. WooCommerce tops the top 10 in the US, outperforming other platforms like Squarespace Commerce, Shopify, OpenCart, Magento, and Prestashop by a wide margin. The share of stores created on the basis of WooCommerce is 36% here; the total share of other platforms is not even close to this figure.
As for the statistics in Russia, here WooCommerce outpaced OpenCart by a small margin - 37% versus 22%.
Top 10 online store CMS rating USA vs Russia 2016
To somehow clarify the situation and help you answer the question: “Which CMS is better for an online store”, let's look at the most popular CMS systems for online stores.
WooCommerce (36% USA, 22% Russia)
WooCommerce is a powerful plugin that plugs into the world's most popular CMS platform. It is available absolutely free. It uses open source code, so anyone can modify it to suit their needs. Additional flexibility is provided by the possibility of full customization through a convenient WordPress control panel.
For WordPress sites, in particular for WooCommerce online stores, there are simply an incredibly large number, so you can choose the most suitable one for yourself and adapt to your needs. For any kind of online store there is a WordPress template/theme/template. Each template has a responsive design and works confidently with mobile devices. . There are many additional extensions for WordPress WooCommerce, including free ones, so your store will have unlimited functionality.
The WordPress platform provides a high degree of reliability, but you can additionally use third-party solutions. Security is never superfluous, especially for an online store.
OpenCart (5% - USA, 38% - Russia)
The OpenCart platform, specially created for online stores, appeared not so long ago as WordPress (in 2012), but during this time it has already managed to win the recognition of many online entrepreneurs. In Russia, as you can see in the chart above, it is ahead of WooCommerce, although WooCommerce is well ahead of all other CMS platforms for online stores in the .com domain zone, including OpenCart.
Just like WordPress WooCommerce, OpenCart is a completely open and free shop CMS. New updates are constantly being released to it, which means it is also reliable. On OpenCart you can find a lot of useful modules at an affordable price. One of the most important advantages of OpenCart is the support of a large number of payment systems, including Webmoney.
You can find paid OpenCart templates.
We have already compared these two platforms with each other before. You can read an article on this topic at the link.
VirtueMart (<1% — США, 12% — Россия)
VirtueMart is an e-commerce solution based on Joomla CMS (similar to WooCommerce for WordPress). Although Joomla is not a specialized platform for ecommerce, by installing one of the components for an online store, you can get a full-fledged online trading platform. One such component is VirtueMart. There are many modules available for it that will help expand the functionality of your store. Built-in analytics and marketing capabilities are supported. The disadvantage is that the platform is rather complicated to work with, so it will not be as easy for beginners to work with it as, for example, with WooCommerce.
What CMS online store to choose?
The choice of CMS is a purely individual matter. It all depends on the specific tasks, requirements and scope of your project. We believe that WooCommerce has - on a par with other solutions - and will soon rise in popularity in Russia from second to first place due to its rapid development and wide popularity among WordPress fans.
This is the best solution for those who want to get a powerful and reliable online store with good functionality and expandability at an affordable price. In addition, there are many cool templates for WooCommerce. To make our online store CMS rating even more interesting, we will present some of these templates as an example.
WordPress WooCommerce Template Examples
Fashion Plus - template for WordPress CMS clothing store
The Fashion Plus template was created specifically for a clothing store. Includes three ready-made demo themes, several store page styles and headers. Supports the Slider Revolution plugin for slideshows and Visual Composer for fast page creation.
XStore - Responsive Universal Template
XStore is a great example of a template that has ready-made solutions for almost any type of store, whether it's an eyewear store, cosmetics store, engineering equipment store, furniture store or bike store. Several unique mouse hover effects are available. The template has high page load rates. There are several options for mega menus and blog layouts.
Electro - Flexible WooCommerce Electronics Store Template
On the basis of Electro, you can create a simple CMS store for electronics and home appliances. Included is a special Electro Extensions plugin with extensions for a drop-down mega menu, a product carousel, special offers and an improved live search (Live Search). The template also supports plugins from the YITH site: Wishlist (for a list of desired products) and WooCompare (for comparing products).
In addition to the regular menu, the template also has a special menu for mobile devices. To organize the products in the catalog, you can use the tabs with categories. Products can be displayed in a list or a grid. Supports Quick View Items and Deal of the Day. Drop down basket. There are cool icons for decoration.
Mega Store - WooCommerce template for various stores
Mega Store comes with six pre-made homepage layouts. You can choose from several header options to organize a convenient product catalog and footer. For each store page, you can customize the structure, position of the sidebar and add various effects. The product grid supports one to six columns.
We really hope that our comparison of CMS for online store was useful for you. We have prepared the top 10 CMS rating for online stores not only to show dry statistics, but also to help you answer the question: “Which CMS to choose for an online store?”. Whatever your decision, the main thing is that it suits you.
If you don't know what it takes to create a successful commerce site, read the separate article dedicated to this topic. To create an online store, you will also need high-quality hosting. For an online store, this is especially important. If you decide to choose a WordPress WooCommerce solution, read the article about . We wish you good luck in choosing a platform and creating an online store. High conversions and successful sales to you!
Alexander is the founder of the Web Lab of Success website project, created to support beginners and continuing Internet entrepreneurs. He is a convinced workaholic with professional experience in managing the editorial office of an online magazine, creating and managing his own online store. Main occupation: promotion of businesses (including online stores) through Facebook and Google Adwords. Main passion: website monetization through affiliate marketing tools and Google Adsense. Personal verified records: 3 million blog visitors per month.
